Also what they would call a cybersquatted domain is quite different from what your defination would be. Counterfeiting, which is the sale of counterfeit goods, which is also illlegal.ĬADNA calls alleged trademark infringers, which includes all the above, “online criminals” and states that a cybersquatted domain can generate $10,000+ annually for a $10 registration (almost meaning that all cybersqatted domains do so. Phishing, an activity which is already criminal, where sites are faked to look like the real site and users are fooled to give their account information to the fake site.Ĥ. ![]() Harmful Diversion, which is also done by ISP and registrars, when they serve up a ads on a not resolving pages ģ. Brand Infringement, which they are seeking to expand from the current trademark infringement protectionsĢ. In making this statement CADNA places a wide range of activity in the same bucket labeling them all criminal and abusive.ġ. With the high margins posted by online criminals-many cybersquatted domains that are simply used to post sponsored advertisements produce $10,000 per year and cost just $10 to maintain-it is clear that this form of online abuse needs attention.”””” “””This forum brought together brands from across the globe to share collective knowledge, experiences and strategies for combating brand infringement, harmful diversion, phishing and other online abuses such as counterfeiting. Particularly troubling is the following language: We will reprint the press release below, but here the important parts you need to know:ĬANDA is getting better organized, gaining more support throughout the world, in both membership and dollars, and in particular does not like domainers. This past Thursday, the Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse (CADNA) held a conference in London called the “Online Brand Abuses and Internet Governance Education Forum”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |